EG11 Freshman Computer Composition
Peer Review
Title of Essay: Research Essay: Reproduction
Author's
Name: Oribel Archila
Reviewer's
Name: Renee Powers-Ficarra
1.
What did you like best about this essay?
It was Phenomenal! Thoroughly researched and extremely well written.
2. How
interesting is the introduction? Does it make you want to continue to read the
paper? Why or why not?
The authors stand point was "crystal clear" on her opinion of reproductive technology"
3.
What is the thesis statement? Does the author need to make the thesis clearer?
" I am strongly opposed to the procedure of invitro fertilization and I do not see anything ethical involving reproductive technology."
4.
Where in the essay could the author better develop his/her ideas by using
examples, comparison-contrast, or cause and effect?
Not applicable- this was extremely well prepared.
5. Is
each paragraph in the essay unified? Or do some of the paragraphs contain
irrelevant sentences or words that need to be omitted?
Relevant factual information was used.
6.
What paragraphs in the draft, if any, do not support the thesis and need to be
omitted?
Not applicable
7. Is
there a place in the essay where the writing confused you? How can the author
better clarify his/her thoughts?
No, this was very clearly written and layout was arranged well.
8. How
clear is the purpose of the essay? How well has the author met the needs of
his/her audience?
The purpose of the essay is stated right from the beginning- feelings of reproductive technology to be considered unethical.
9. How
effective is the ending? Is the essay ended in such a way that you know it is
the end?
The ending supports opinion and incorporates supporting facts.
10.
What did the author do extremely well?
The entire preparation of the essay was well done.
11.
What could the author do better next time?
No improvements necessary.
12. Has the author made all the arguments for this assignment?
All arguments have been supported, and in-depth factual information was explored. Great Job!