What Faculty Can Do to Encourage Academic Integrity
The faculty member should:
- Inform students of the academic integrity policies and expectations in their course;
- Apply academic integrity policies and expectations equitably to all students;
- Review the circumstances of a suspected academic misconduct incident with the student if possible;
- Impose appropriate academic consequences and educational opportunities for academic misconduct;
- Report academic misconduct incidents to the Campus Associate Dean of Student Affairs;
- Initiate student conduct action through the Campus Associate Dean of Student Affairs for flagrantly dishonest and serious violations of integrity.
If the faculty member determines that the academic misconduct was the result of the student’s inexperience with academic standards or wishes the student to further their understanding of academic integrity concepts and skills, the faculty member may require that the student participate in an educational opportunity.
Educational opportunities can be provided by the classroom faculty member or through resources at the College. Educational opportunities can:
- Focus on ethical decision-making in college and in students’ intended professions.
- Provide students an opportunity to develop academic integrity competency skills such as summarizing and citing.
As examples of educational opportunities, faculty could require students to:
- Discuss the SCCC academic integrity website or the Student Code of Conduct
- Write a reflection paper about the importance of academic integrity
- Complete academic integrity educational session/s on topics such as ethical decision-making and time management
- Learn and apply academic conventions for citing sources
- Learn and apply academic writing skills such as paraphrasing, summarizing, and citing.
There are many effective academic integrity tutorials available from other institutions. Here is one example from the University of Maryland Global Campus.
Academic Misconduct Examples | Suggested Consequences for Each Level |
Level 1 | |
Misconduct is minor or results from inexperience with academic integrity principles and policies. Examples:
|
|
Level 2 | |
Misconduct is dishonest in character but less flagrant than Level 3. In some cases, the misconduct could be impromptu due to poor time management or other circumstances.
Examples:
|
In addition to Level 1 consequences, faculty may:
|
Level 3 |
|
Misconduct includes actions that are flagrantly dishonest and serious violations of integrity. Examples:
|
In addition to Level 1 & 2 consequences, faculty may:
|